Casino UGC · Canada
Canada Has Three Casino Ad Rulebooks Now
Alberta opened in July. The rules moved in June.
Canada went from one open market to two this year, and the Canada casino advertising rules now sit in three places. Most published advice still points at a schedule that no longer exists.
Short answer: Ontario has the AGCO standards, Alberta has the AGLC standards that took effect on 18 June 2026, and a national Code sits over both from January 2026. Alberta's market opened on 13 July 2026. Every other province still runs through a provincial operator, so private creator campaigns do not apply there.
Alberta's open market began on 13 July 2026.
Alberta's advertising rules moved into a new document on 18 June 2026.
What changed in Canada this year
Was your last brief for Canada written before the summer? Then it is out of date in two separate ways, and the Canada casino advertising rules are the reason.
For four years Ontario was the only Canadian province where private operators could take players directly. That ended on 13 July 2026. Alberta's open market began, and about fifty operator sites had signed up to enter.
So the Canada casino advertising rules are no longer one regulator's problem. There are two open markets now. Each has its own regulator and its own wording. On top of both sits a national Code, in force since January 2026.
Three rulebooks, in order
The AGCO's Registrar's Standards for Internet Gaming cover Ontario. The AGLC's Standards and Requirements for Internet Gaming cover Alberta. The Canadian Gaming Association's Code for Responsible Gaming Advertising sits across the country, administered by Ad Standards.
Two are binding on registrants. One is a voluntary commitment. A creator clip can trip any of the three.
Which rulebook applies to you?
Pick where the campaign is aimed. Guidance, not compliance sign-off.
Ontario, the first rulebook
Ontario has had four years to settle. Its casting rule is the one most agencies already know, and it anchors the Canada casino advertising rules.
AGCO Standard 2.03 has been in force since 28 February 2024. It bars active and retired athletes where the athlete has a deal or arrangement with an operator or gaming-related supplier. Direct or indirect, both count. The one exception is an ad whose sole purpose is promoting responsible play.
It also bars celebrities, role models, social media influencers and entertainers who would likely be expected to appeal to minors. Cartoon figures and symbols are covered by the same line.
Three more standards shape the script and the roster. Standard 2.05 bans public advertising of inducements. Standard 1.19 makes operators responsible for the third parties they contract with. Standard 1.21 requires those marketing third parties not to promote unregistered Ontario-facing sites.
Where to read the detail
We have written the Ontario casting side out in full, clause by clause. It sits in our guide to who can appear in an Ontario casino clip. This page is the national view of the Canada casino advertising rules, not the Ontario deep dive.
Alberta, the second rulebook
Alberta's wording closely mirrors Ontario's. Closely is not identically. The gaps are where briefs fail, so read this half of the Canada casino advertising rules on its own terms.
The AGLC's ad standards took effect on 18 June 2026, ahead of the 13 July launch. On casting, the pattern will look familiar.
Who may appear
Athletes may be used only to advocate responsible gaming, exclusively. Celebrities, influencers, entertainers and cartoon figures are banned where there are reasonable grounds to believe they could appeal to minors. No one who is, or looks like, a minor may be in the ad. Themes aimed at minors are out.
What the clip may say
Ads for inducements, bonuses and credits are banned. There are two exceptions. The operator's own app or site is one. Direct marketing to customers who opted in is the other.
Key conditions must be shown the first time the offer appears. Anything further has to be reachable in no more than one redirection.
An offer may be called free only if it is actually free. It cannot be called risk-free if the player has to risk their own money to use it, or to withdraw winnings. Those are the same two words that catch creator copy in Ontario.
What Alberta adds
Two things are worth putting in a brief. First, opted-in players must be able to withdraw that consent easily, at any time. Second, contests, draws, prizes and giveaways sit in their own promotions section. There, the AGLC can order a promotion adjusted or ended.
Operators must also check that third-party ads run on their behalf comply. Same duty as Ontario, different document.
The trap in most published advice
This is the part that will catch people who research Alberta by reading articles rather than the source.
Until June, Alberta's ad rules sat in Schedule 1.1 of the Gaming, Liquor and Cannabis Regulation. On 18 June 2026 the AGLC repealed that schedule. The advertising and promotions standards moved into section 4.1 of the Standards and Requirements for Internet Gaming.
The substance moved. It did not disappear. But a lot of good legal writing was written before June. It cites Schedule 1.1 by name. If your notes point there, they point at a repealed provision.
Why this matters to a creator brief
Because briefs get copied. A brief written in April that cites Schedule 1.1 still describes the right behaviour. It also looks wrong to anyone checking it in October. Cite the current document.
It is also a reminder about the Canada casino advertising rules generally. Two regulators and one industry body are all actively moving. A brief is a dated document, and it should carry the date it was written.
The national Code sits over both
This is the layer agencies miss. It is not tied to either province, so it falls outside the usual checks.
The Canadian Gaming Association's Code for Responsible Gaming Advertising took effect in January 2026. Ad Standards runs it. It is voluntary, so it binds members and signatories, not everyone.
It still has teeth. Ad Standards can require an advertiser to change or withdraw an ad. It can go public if a final decision is ignored. Within the Canada casino advertising rules this is the layer with the widest reach, because it is not tied to a province.
Two clauses matter most to creator video.
The age floor
Clause III.5 says models, actors and influencers should be at least 25. Their age should be checked against ID. They should also look well above the legal age to play.
That is stricter than either province's rulebook. It is the line that quietly removes a chunk of any creator roster, and the one agencies find last.
Disclosure and targeting
Clause III.8 says an influencer must flag a paid tie to the brand and name it. Clause III.6 says advertisers must actively use age targeting tools so the ad is not served to anyone under 21.
Clause IV.1 requires a responsible play message in every ad, social media included. The Code also defines an advertiser to include affiliates and influencers, so the creator is inside it, not outside.
The rest of Canada has not opened
Two open markets is not the same as a national market, and this is where campaign plans overreach.
Outside Ontario and Alberta, online play runs through the province's own operator, not private brands. British Columbia, Quebec, Saskatchewan and the Atlantic provinces all sit that way.
So a private operator cannot run a creator campaign at those players the way it can in Ontario or Alberta. The Canada casino advertising rules are not one national permission slip.
That has a blunt effect on targeting. Take a clip aimed at a national Canadian audience. For most private operators, that clip mostly reaches provinces where they cannot take the player.
What that means in a media plan
Geo-target the two open provinces rather than Canada. It costs less. It wastes less reach. And it keeps the campaign inside the Canada casino advertising rules that actually apply to you.
It also avoids a second problem. Serving an ad to a province where you are not registered is not a neutral act. The AGCO rule on unregistered sites shows how regulators think about this. The Canada casino advertising rules reward tight targeting.
One brief, or two?
This is the practical question for anyone running creator video in both provinces.
Our answer is one brief, written to the strictest reading, with a short per-province annex. Here is why that beats running two.
| Point | Ontario | Alberta |
|---|---|---|
| Athletes | Barred where an arrangement exists | Responsible gaming advocacy only |
| Influencers appealing to minors | Likely to appeal | Reasonable grounds to believe |
| Public inducement ads | Prohibited | Prohibited |
| Where offers are allowed | Own site, or consented direct message | Own site or app, or opted-in direct marketing |
| Free and risk-free wording | Restricted | Restricted |
| Withdrawing consent | Not specified the same way | Must be easy, at any time |
| Contests and giveaways | Inside the general rules | Own promotions section |
| Third party conduct | Operator is responsible | Operator must ensure compliance |
The two athlete rules are worded differently. They land in a similar place. The two minors tests are worded differently too, and both are judgement calls.
Writing to the stricter reading of each costs you almost nothing in creative range. It removes a whole class of argument later. That is the cheapest way to handle the Canada casino advertising rules while they keep moving.
What the annex holds
Three lines, not three pages. The Alberta consent-withdrawal point. The Alberta promotions section, if the campaign involves a giveaway. The Ontario rule about creators who post for unregistered sites.
The roster is the other half of this. We filter our casino creator network by province before a brief goes out, because a creator who clears one rulebook does not always clear the other.
Will one brief clear both provinces?
Five checks against the stricter reading. Guidance, not compliance sign-off.
What this page does not settle
Here are the honest limits. A page on the Canada casino advertising rules without them is just advertising.
Both minors tests are judgement calls with no published list behind them. We can tell you to pull the audience age breakdown and keep it on file. We cannot tell you where either regulator draws the line for a specific creator.
The national Code is voluntary. Whether it binds your campaign depends on whether your operator is a member or signatory. Put that question to them in writing.
Alberta's market is young. It opened in July 2026. Early enforcement will tell us things the wording does not. We have described what the standards say, not how strictly they land in year one. Nobody honestly knows that yet.
This is guidance drawn from published sources, not legal advice. Have your operator's compliance team sign off on the specific reading before a campaign runs. If you want the casting and brief side handled, that is what our UGC creators for casinos service does. The wider list sits on our casino UGC service page.
Frequently asked questions
Which Canadian provinces allow private casino operators?
Are Alberta's ad rules the same as Ontario's?
What happened to Alberta's Schedule 1.1?
Can one creator brief cover both provinces?
Does the national Code apply in Alberta too?
Should we target a campaign at Canada or at provinces?
Written by Rhys McKay · Published 30 October 2026 · Reviewed for accuracy, rights and platform-policy language.